LJ Holden's blog

"One reason I won't support a republic"

Cameron Slater of Whale Oil fame writes that he has two reasons for not supporting a New Zealander as our head of State: Jim Bolger and Helen Clark.

Submission to the Constitutional Conversation

I believe that the concept of inherited power and privilege is wrong and it is not the Kiwi way.

Monarchy isn't cheaper: 2013 Budget

Kiwi taxpayers are now coughing up $8m a year for the "Queen's representative" in New Zealand, proving the claim that the monarchy is cheaper once again to be simply untrue.

Apologies to Andrew Townend


The Hunter Council Chamber, Victoria University.

As many readers will know, I took part in the final of the Centre for Public Law and Law Foundation's constitutional debates at Victoria University of Wellington last week. The debate was broadcast on Radio NZ National on Sunday (audio here). I'm not going to claim victory (or loss) in the debate,  that's up to the audience to decide. But I have had a lot of positive feedback on the debate, as well as praise for my main opponent, Michael Mabbett, in articulating the case against a New Zealand head of State.

An appointed Governor-General versus an independent head of State

A recent skirmish between the Aussie Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition underlines what's wrong with the status quo of the Prime Minister "advising" the Sovereign who to appoint as the So

Republic debate in Wellington

The Centre for Public Law is holding a debate next Monday at Victoria University of Wellington in the Hunter Council Chamber from 6:30pm. There's been a change to the billing - unfortunately Jim Bolger can't make it, so they've substituted the former Prime Minister for myself.

Jamaica: "a Bill to establish Jamaica as a republic within the Commonwealth of Nations."

The Jamaica Observer reports on the opening of Jamaica's parliament at the start of this month.

Book Review: "In The Ring - A Commonwealth Memoir" by Don McKinnon


In The Ring - A Commonwealth Memoir

Don McKinnon's memoir of his time as Secretary-General, In The Ring, does not disappoint. As I wrote here a few weeks ago when the book was released, this book is probably the most important book on the modern Commonwealth ever. I'm even more convinced of that now. Despite what the reviews say, (Audrey Young's review in The New Zealand Herald being one of the worst examples) the book has very little to do with the British monarchy or McKinnon's relationship with the Queen.

In the Ring
actually re-enforces the side Commonwealth we don't see - the side beyond the link to New Zealand's "heritage". The organisation does great work for democracy, human rights and development. 

You could be forgiven for thinking that it's just another talkfest or international junket for foreign ministers. Looking at (almost) all of the reviews of the book in New Zealand's news media, it's almost as if the media think the Commonwealth is the monarchy. Despite what the book reviews said and the questions the television journalists asked, McKinnon only discusses the British monarchy briefly in the second chapter of the book. The fact so much focus is put on one chapter of a thirteen chapter bookshows that the public perception of the organisation, especially in the "old Dominions," is that the Commonwealth is part of the monarchy and the two are intimately tied together. McKinnon makes this observation in the book a number of times, especially when recalling a meeting with the Queen Mother (who said to him he had to look after the "family"). He describes this as a "19th century" view of the Commonwealth. Sadly no journalist I've seen reviewing the book mentions this. This is particularly strange given how explosive it is.

Back online - website changes

Apologies for our recent issues with the website - we managed to get back online yesterday after an outage of three days. A faulty back-up during a regular upgrade was to blame. But we're back and everything's working again nicely.

Sir Geoffrey Palmer QC's new position on a New Zealand head of State

Sir Geoffrey Palmer QC* writes on the constitutional review in The Nelson Mail today, stating:

I am sure big change will happen, although I doubt it will happen immediately.

Civics education: Government House resources; a retraction

Two weeks ago I put up a poll asking whether Government House should re-publish its education resources. I did so on the mistaken belief that the resources that had previously been online were lost forever, and I had planned to e-mail Government House about this fact.

Succession: how much has it cost us?

Back in March, we asked how much of the Cabinet Office's $7.3m "advice" budget was spent on advice for changing the British monarchy's succession rules? The response: The Cabinet Office has no idea.

Post-Treaty Settlements

Post Treaty-Settlements is a fascinating website. It's a collection of essays about what New Zealand could look like after the Treaty settlement process is concluded. The tentative date for that is set for 2014.

David Farrar on Fiji's draft constitution

David Farrar has a copy of the proposed draft Fijian constitution. While the process for bringing about the new constitution was anything but democratic, it contains a number of interesting points worth debate.

"Constitutional reform or expedient pick ‘n’ mix?"

Law firm Russell McVeigh writes on the constitutional review:

Syndicate content