Succession changes should be part of constitutional review

MEDIA RELEASE 29 October 2011

The Republican Movement calls on the government to include changes to the monarchy's succession rules in the constitutional review. New Zealanders have the right to decide the rules that determine who our head of state is.

"The proposed changes anounced at CHOGM is irrelevant to every day New Zealanders, just like the monarchy itself. The changes, to remove the sexist rules from the succession, only remind us how long the monarchy has discriminated against women and Catholics," said Savage, vice-chair of the Republican Movement.

"These aren't just out of date rules about which Windsor will assume the British throne. They're a statement about our constitution and about who is and who isn't allowed to be New Zealand's head of state."

An agreement, signed yesterday during the Commonwealth Head of Government Meeting (CHOGM), calls on the 16 "realm" countries to remove the ban on older females succeeding to the throne ahead of male heirs, and to allow the monarch to marry a Catholic. The rule against our head of state from being a Catholic remains, because the British monarch is head of the Church of England.

"These rules still mean that if you're a New Zealander - Pakeha, Maori, Pacific or Asian, you are not as good as the British royal family and can't be head of state of New Zealand" concluded Savage.

NOTES

ENDS

Media contact: Savage 021 620 987 (m)

The Republican Movement is a network of New Zealanders who want our head of state to be elected by New Zealanders - either directly or indirectly.

We are committed to:

  • involving all New Zealanders in the republic debate;
  • focusing on ideas, not personalities;
  • winning a referendum to establish the republic;

Creating a republic does not require any change to the Treaty of Waitangi, flag or Commonwealth membership. For more information, see our website: www.republic.org.nz

Facebook: www.facebook.com/nzrepublic Twitter: www.twitter.com/nzrepublic

Comments

col's picture

It currently discrimminates against catholics, thats correct right. So its ok for them to marry methodists,seven day eventists and jehovas witness? If somebody may know that would be cool.

Thanks

Col

Matt's picture

That's correct, col. By the letter of the law, a person in the royal line of succession may marry a person of any faith (or none) barring a Roman Catholic.

LJ Holden's picture

Sort of. The law itself (Act of Settlement 1701) first on bans Roman Catholics ("...all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should professe the Popish Religion or marry a Papist should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever") and states all monarchs "shall join in communion with the Church of England." So they cover both angles: excluding Catholics and requiring communion with the Church of England.

Chair, Republican Movement - contact me online or call on +64 27 699 1350

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Syndicate content