The Coming of the "Shadow King"

It sounds like something out of Lord of the Rings, but sadly this bizarre state of affairs is the constitutional reality for New Zealand: The Sunday Telegraph and Daily Mail reported the excellent research by Republic yesterday that our hereditary head of state's grandsons are to start take over their grandparent's "duties", apparently because their father, who is the actual heir to the throne, is not as popular as they are (Buckingham Palace has, of course, denied the reports). Apparently Prince William is to be groomed as a "shadow King", meaning he's the stand-by option, like the shadow ministers of the United Kingdom (in New Zealand we tend to say the "opposition spokesperson on...", being more egalitarian!). This clearly explains why Prince William is coming to New Zealand in January, and not his father Prince Charles.

If this is Buckingham Palace's strategy for saving the monarchy down under, it's a very risky one. While Prince William certainly is popular amongst younger New Zealanders, who tend to show stronger support for a republic, that popularity is largely based on his celebrity chic. As Prince Charles knows (most New Zealanders old enough will remember Charles drew crowds back in the 60s and 70s, which from the picture's we've seen show a disproportionate number of young females in the crowd!), that will eventually fade with time. Moreover, this Royal tour will be devoid it seems of the sort of pomp and ceremony most people like about the monarchy, because the Palace wants to make the monarchy more "informal".

Comments

Anon's picture

William is not a monarch so

William is not a monarch so "pomp" would be less than for the Queen. Opening the supreme court will no doubt have some formilty and "pomp" NZ style.
LJ Holden's picture

Wait a second - so we don't

Wait a second - so we don't get pomp and ceremony for the opening of our Supreme Court because we're not high enough up the food chain? What a joke.

Republican Movement chair
Tim Sharp's picture

In New Zealand and the UK the


In New Zealand and the UK the monarchy does not have a great deal to offer and previous PR approaches coming out of the Palace (1) personality cults (2) good works (charities, hospitals etc) (3) the brilliance and foresight of Charles Windsor have come to their natural end. (3) Because Charles can't keep his mouth shut.  The current Narrative form is celebrity culture - but that comes and goes too. The official picture for this tour is a very airbrushed William. Role on elected heads of state for NZ and the UK.
LJ Holden's picture

Which is why the strategy is

Which is why the strategy is utterly bizarre. It might create short-term good sentiment for the monarchy, but that's it.

Republican Movement chair
Anon's picture

It is sensible for the royal

It is sensible for the royal family to confer more duties onto a new generation. After all both Princess Anne and Prince Charles are approaching eligibility age for old age pensions. As the modern democracies of the UK, Canada, NZ etc. still have the monarchy and the role of the monarchy was approved by Australian voters, there must be much to acquaint themselves with for monarchs-in-waiting. it would be utterly bizarre if Prince William were NOT given a greater numbers of duties to perform! 
LJ Holden's picture

I hate to break this to you,

I hate to break this to you, but the "learning the ropes" argument is just spin. If it were, William would've been sent to open some minor NHS clinic in Dorset, not half way around the world. Otherwise we can assume the Royal family thinks New Zealand public buildings are so inferior they only send the trainee to do the job.

No, this trip is about public relations. The monarchists and Royal watchers all know that.

Republican Movement chair
Rich d'Rich's picture

Thing is, it's likely that

Thing is, it's likely that Charles Windsor (b. 1948) will outlive his mother (b. 1926) by several years (18, on average life expectancies). Unless he plans to abdicate or renounce the throne, it'll be hard for the UK government of the day to depose him and arrange a succession to his mother.

So they'll be stuck with Chuck for 20 or so years, then have William (b. 1982) take the throne in middle age, followed by any offspring he might produce some 30 or so years later.

Really, their best bet would be a few convenient helicopter crashes. Maybe the RAF could revoke the grounding of HRH?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Syndicate content